About VERGE


 
some opinions
Displaying 1-2 of 2 total.
1
Please enter a numerical value for the importance of this sticky.
Enter 0 to unsticky.
ShadowDrak
I need semi accurate collision detection. It needs to be more accurate than squares anyway. i was wondering if flat polygons would be the way to go. It should be faster than using pixels. I'm just wondering if it would be a good idea. And also if it would be fast enough in verge. Maybe comparing only entities on screen for collision. because i don't care about any of the other entities.
Oh and also... maped seems to be ignoring the alpha channel and changes it to either black or white depending on the level. I've only been using one layer lately so maybe it has something to do with that.
that's all i can think of at the moment.

-ShadowDrak


Posted on 2001-08-24 03:21:44

Ear
Bounding box detection is as fast as you can get. If it isn't accurate enough, make the bouding box smaller. ;)


- Ear "It's time for the human race to enter the solar system."

Posted on 2001-08-24 22:05:17


Displaying 1-2 of 2 total.
1
 
Newest messages
I Like Ham.
in Castle Heck
(by ThinIce on 2018-08-17)
Steamworks Integration
in VERGE Developers Forum
(by Eldritch05 on 2018-08-16)
Entity Issues
in VERGE Help
(by Rysen on 2018-06-05)
Epic of Serinor: Dawnshadow
in General Discussion
(by Rysen on 2018-05-13)

Ben McGraw's lovingly crafted this website from scratch for years.
It's a lot prettier this go around because of Jon Wofford.
Verge-rpg.com is a member of the lunarnet irc network, and would like to take this opportunity to remind you that regardless how babies taste, it is wrong to eat them.