|
Verge3 is at the forefront of the games industry! Displaying 1-10 of 10 total.
1
blues_zodiakos
|
It's true... because Verge3 seems to be about the only thing with music and graphics that I can run correctly on my testing computer that has the new Windows Vista build on it. But that counts for something, doesn't it?
And yes... that's out of the box. I did have to change the sound device parameter in the sully chronicles verge.cfg file to '1' though to get sound working. Small price to pay!
I'd post screenshots, but I have yet to get a decent screenshot program installed yet.
Posted on 2005-12-21 19:26:19
|
CrazyAznGamer
|
Can't you press 'Prnt Scrn'(Copy Screen) and Ctrl + V(Paste) while in Paint? Or does Windows Vista have not one or the other?
Posted on 2005-12-21 22:37:10
|
mcgrue
|
prntscrn ftw
Posted on 2005-12-21 23:26:58
|
blues_zodiakos
|
Well, I made a screenshot of it, and I tried to upload it, but I'm a twit, and accidentally uploaded it thrice. T_T As soon as it's approved, I'll link it! :D
-edit: As promised, here it is. :D I think this link will work, anyways.
Posted on 2005-12-22 12:09:30 (last edited on 2005-12-23 12:35:00)
|
Interference22
|
Wow. Vistas looks... Exactly like Windows Xp, with some Mac OS touches added to unsubtly hide the fact that it appears Microsoft have been doing bugger all to Windows for the past 5 years. When will they stop following trends and start *starting* some, eh?
V3, a fine example of something that actually does get better and more feature-packed as the years roll by, is joyfully still compatible with the next iteration of the world's foremost purveyor of electronic grief. Yay.
Posted on 2005-12-25 19:12:43
|
resident
|
The REAL irony about Vista is, I'm probably going to just turn most of the advanced UI thingies off.
The only concessions to modernity on my PC are a double width taskbar and a higher desktop resolution. At first glance, you'd probably have diffculty distinguishing it from my Win 95 desktop of god knows how many years ago.
Posted on 2005-12-26 01:41:35
|
blues_zodiakos
|
From what I've been able to tell from running it though, it's not just Windows XP with a pretty interface (that's Aero Glass I'm running on it). There's thousands of little things that have been changed that are possibly noticable right away, such as the ability to make virtual folders from desktop search queries, to the fact that IPv6 is not only completely functional, but is actually the DEFAULT protocol for doing anything (although IPv4 is still implemented via some fancy-schmancy dual-layered thingamabob...). There's other strange improvements too... Windows can now use any memory in a USB flashdrive to make paging commonly-used memory way faster (paging to flash is about 10-15 times faster on average than paging to harddrive), and setting that up is like... a 2 click process. Administrator is no longer the default login, just like almost every OTHER OS has been doing for a while... this makes things alot more secure, in theory, although I wonder if the average windows user will be able to put up with the 'This action require administrator priviledges' dialog that comes up... file indexing has changed drastically both in speed and the amount of data that is indexed, putting it right up there with google desktop or Finder (although if I decided I'm not interested in the integrated features that provides, such as virtual folders, I might actually use google desktop instead).
Oh yeah, and when you press windows-tab, it does this cool zoomy thing where all the windows tilt 45 degrees sideways and you can cycle through them with your mousewheel. It's actually pretty functional.
Despite it being kinda the cool thing lately to just assume Vista is going to be Windows XP with a purty new interface (and it is pretty, and responsive, at least in the newest beta), most of subsystems are quite different under the hood. Alot of the new UI work isn't just to make it prettier either, and will be available with any of the themes - a great many things have been shuffled around, mainly with a focus on putting them in places that actually make sense now.
I'm kind of a fan of using different tools in for the tasks they are designed for.... which is why I run my server applications on Linux, and use Windows for application and web development. I can't help it if I get excited when someone makes a better tool. ;D
Posted on 2005-12-26 02:15:30 (last edited on 2005-12-26 02:18:07)
|
resident
|
Yeah, I was kinda assuming there would be good differences "under the hood". While it may APPEAR to be 95, my OS is undoutedly XP, and with good reason. There are a LOT of improvements that aren't immediately obvious, and I'm sure Vista will continue that trend. Also, I'm pretty sure I'll have to upgrade to Vista at some point, if only to get the best out of my Athlon64. (And there's now a 64bit version of Half-Life 2. Yays!)
I was kinda making the point that, to me, it doesn't matter how many new shiney spangly things they cram into a Windows UI - I'm just going to turn most of them off anyways :D
Posted on 2005-12-26 03:53:00 (last edited on 2005-12-26 03:55:18)
|
CrazyAznGamer
|
Quote: Originally posted by resident
I was kinda making the point that, to me, it doesn't matter how many new shiney spangly things they cram into a Windows UI - I'm just going to turn most of them off anyways :D Rock on simple UI! W00t11!1!!
Posted on 2005-12-26 10:42:45
|
blues_zodiakos
|
I'm dying to test out the 64-bit version myself. :( My laptop has an Athlon64 in it. :/
Posted on 2005-12-26 23:23:59
|
Displaying 1-10 of 10 total.
1
|
|