|
Trying to set up Verge3, having problems, feeling Newbish Displaying 1-12 of 12 total.
1
DanteC
|
OK, brief explanation of my setup, running Win98 on my desktop, which is quite rubbish(can't fix graphics settings so getting askewed colours only), but can browse the internet. Needless to say, I want to use my laptop, which is also rubbish, but is running Win98 2nd ed, and has a far bigger hard drive( 4.5gig as apposed to 2), though it can't handle the internet. I've not got a network running either. I've downloaded Verge3, and Sully seperatly. Running Verge from Sully I get a 'Compiling VC code please V(??! Graphics are probable screwed)) message, then it goes back to the desktop and I've no idea what I'm meant to then run. Dragging Verge.CFG onto Verge just gives me a message going 'Vid_bpp(24) not a standard value'.
I thought I might need the .NET package I've seen mentioned, but when I tried to run it (I'm using a flash memory pen to transfer files), I get a message saying I need to have Explorer 5.1 to run it. Fair enough, I download what I think is IE6, but then find that it is only an installer package that gets the other files of another site, and I can't figure out what is what so I can't just copy over the files from my desktop. Does anyone know of a place where I can download a full copy of IE without having to be connectec to the net to install it? Or am I just going on a completly wrong tangent here? Sorry this is a bit long but I'm getting a bit frustrated getting this thing to work. If it doesn't work, how stable are Verge1 or 2 and would they be simpler to get up and running?
Second of all, does anyone have any advise on coming up with a combat system? Has anyone just made one up from scratch or just duplicated a system from say FFVII or Phantasy Star?
Finally, is it easy enough to make a Shining Force style combat system with Verge? As in a battle map is made, simmilar to a chess board, and the player moves their party around the board to attack enemies. Sorry this is such a big post.
Posted on 2005-04-03 09:10:27
|
mcgrue
|
1) Is your video mode on 24 bit color? Try changing it to 16 or 32, and see if that helps. If it does, be sure to tell us!
2) Concerning IE and .NET, the only site you should ever go to for this sort of upgrade is http://windowsupdate.com. In fact, if you're running windows, you should always go there and completely get up to date on all critical packages ASAP on a fresh install. If you've been running un-updated for a matter of years, months, or even weeks, I would highly recommend saving everything vital and personal off of your harddrive onto a CDR (or, alternately, send yourself the files via gmail) and then reformat your hard drive, reinstall windows, and then immediately go to windowsupdate.com and keep going until it says there's nothing new for you to download.
Then, and only then, are you safe... for now.
3) concerning battle systems, you're better off concerning yourself with 2d systems like FF1-6, Phantasy Star 1-4, Lunar 1&2, etc etc. And as far as things go, I consider a Shining Force-style tactics battle system to be the simplest of all of the different kinds of battle systems to implement in verge.
However, although there are several battle systems provided by users so far, none are really 'entry level' for use at present. Supersorry.
Posted on 2005-04-03 10:17:07
|
DanteC
|
The laptop was running 24-bit before. Trying it on 16-bit makes the game 'playable', but only one eigth of the screen is used (top left if that at all matters). All the colours are 'odd' as well. It's pretty much the same if I try using my desktop monitor. 32-bit isn't an option at all. One of these days I'll have to wipe the desktop and do a fresh install. Last time I trust PC World on buying a laptop for software development. If wiping the desktop HD and reinstalling everything doesn't work, would Verge 1 or 2 be better screen-wise? I managed to get RPG-Maker working but I'd rather use some software that's a C varient (I'm not too fond on game-dev software that does all the hard work, and RPG-Maker seems very restricting).
Posted on 2005-04-03 11:35:23
|
Overkill
|
Well, the reason you weren't able to install the .NET Runtime was probably because the installer is one of those retarded 'Install from the Internet' wizards. So it's stupid and assumes everyone has a net connection. So, you *have to* give your laptop a connection to the Internet if you ever want to install .NET. Because, you can't just install on your PC and copy the files to your laptop, because all the registry jibberish doesn't get copied. So, it's a bit of a mess you got, but not really Verge's fault.
I would suggest you buy a new PC, but likewise would be told to me. I'm poor. ;__;
Posted on 2005-04-03 15:43:19
|
Omni
|
So the full 20 meg (or was it 40 meg?) redistributable of the .NET runtime is actually an internet installer? I'm not sure. I'm pretty confident you can find a full non-internet install redistributable for .NET.
Also, what is really horrible is that to use the Windows Update service you are literally required to do it with Internet Explorer, rather than Mozilla Firefox or Mozilla suite, which are absolutely superior. Geez, I hate Windows Update...
Running in 16-bit mode should be fine for Verge3. What do you mean by 'it only takes up a fourth of the screen?' Is this running full-screen mode, or windowed? You can check the 'windowmode X' flag in user.cfg, where if X is 1, it's windowed, and if X is 0, ie, 'windowmode 0', then Verge runs fullscreen.
Posted on 2005-04-04 10:43:59
|
mcgrue
|
Quote:Originally posted by Omni
Also, what is really horrible is that to use the Windows Update service you are literally required to do it with Internet Explorer, rather than Mozilla Firefox or Mozilla suite, which are absolutely superior. Geez, I hate Windows Update...
Not to put a bee in your bonnet, but I've had to update firefox via the internet twice since starting to use it.
I would hazard the bold statement that no widely-used software is free from exploits. The more popular it is, the more eyes and hands try to poke it's soft spots, and the more need for quick patches there are.
Just because something's not by microsoft does not mean it is bug-free, nor that it is impervious to exploitation.
Posted on 2005-04-04 14:19:22
|
fox_astron
|
I think he was trying to say that he wants to use Firefox to access and run the windows update page, not touting Firefox as a bugless browser.
After all, if windows update were Firefox compatible, you could then remove IE and you wouldn't need most of the bugfixes on the windows update site, ne?
Back to the subject, I'm guessing his laptop is one of those laptops that doesn't stretch 320x240 res screens to fit the entire laptop display.
Posted on 2005-04-04 14:37:40 (last edited on 2005-04-04 14:39:21)
|
DanteC
|
Changing windowmode from 0 to 1 seems to have done the trick. Sully is running I think perfectly now. So thanks everyone for their advise. Before, if you could imagine a screen divided into eigths, the top-left section was the only one showing any animation, with a very limited pallette. In any case if windowmode as 1 is workable then I don't see a problem with just using it set at that.
I probably didn't word it too well but the problem with .net I've been having is that it's demanding I have Internet Explorer 5.1, which when I try to download I just get an installation wizard. I've no idea if .net is just another install wizard or Microsoft cursing me for using Firefox. Could I just use another version of Maped with Verge 3 if .net is not an option? Thanks everyone again for helping a newb out.
Posted on 2005-04-04 14:47:10
|
Omni
|
The only version that makes working Verge3 maps is Maped3...is there no way to install or otherwise download the needed IE install files, save them somewhere, and transfer them to the Internet-less laptop? There must surely be a non-Internet way to get a working version of IE. Aren't the archive files used by the install cached somewhere in the Temporary Internet Files or Temp folder or anything like that?
Also, Fox Astron hit it right on the head. Your laptop probably doesn't stretch small resolutions to cover the entire LCD screen. So when you run something in pure 320x240, the monitor is using literally just 320x240 pixels, not the whole panel.
There may be a BIOS option to alter this -- on my Dell, I can change it via accessing the BIOS setup when the laptop boots, or through the Display Properties -- Settings -- Advanced dialog (video card setup).
And, I was mainly talking about how Firefox can't access Windows Update. Though I firmly believe it is superior to Internet Explorer in many ways. (However, I have noticed that one or two pop-ups have broken through lately. It may be time to update it indeed.)
Posted on 2005-04-04 19:14:06
|
fox_astron
|
If memory serves, when you run IE setup, it downloads everything into a 'setup' folder that should be easy enough to find using a search. So, just run the latest setup for IE on a 98 or 2000 box and search for the install folder.
Barring that, linksys makes good USB ethernet adaptors.
Posted on 2005-04-04 22:51:01
|
Omni
|
And, as an aside. Won't WinXP or 2000 disks have the setup files for IE and other tools on them? I mean, you probably can't install Windows from them due to EULA, but certainly ripping IE's files would be fair game. I used to do that from old Win95 and 98 disks. Surely an IE install could be on an XP or 2K disk. Maybe some friends have one. (Or maybe this is a stupid idea. Never tried it before.)
Posted on 2005-04-05 10:02:49
|
DanteC
|
Just found that .net doesn't need a net connection to install. Now just got to find a copy of Internet Explorer to let it actually run...
Posted on 2005-04-05 14:22:11
|
Displaying 1-12 of 12 total.
1
|
|