Tomt... I don't think whining is going to make grue like you any more. Judging from my interaction with him, he seems to be a really nice guy, so you must have done something significant to piss him off. And as a friendly piece of advice: Your whining is only damaging you all the more. It would've been beneficial to keep your problem with him private.

Justice is but a concept.
Justice does not take on any form in reality.
But neither does love, and we know that exists. So what prevents justice from existing too?

On the other hand, has anyone here had bubble tea? It's black tea with milk/cream and sugar, along with boiled tapioca bubbles, and it is quite refreshing and delicious.

Quote:Originally posted by CrazyAznGamer


On the other hand, has anyone here had bubble tea? It's black tea with milk/cream and sugar, along with boiled tapioca bubbles, and it is quite refreshing and delicious.

Yes! actually, I just had some recently at a Thai restaurant. I actually started shooting the bubble/balls (I think they're the same thing as what you're talking about) out of my straw, and I was asked to leave.

I assure you that Mojitos are better.

Quote:Originally posted by CrazyAznGamer

Justice is but a concept.
Justice does not take on any form in reality.
But neither does love, and we know that exists. So what prevents justice from existing too?.

Were you listening? Justice does exist. By it's very inception as a concept it has to have a basis in reality - no matter how vague - in order for the human mind to think it up. As an example, someone thought up flying pigs: they don't exists but pigs do and so does flying, therefore making the whole idea imaginable.

And no, can't say I've ever had bubble tea. Sounds good. Every tried Lapsang Souchong? It's bloody awful: like drinking water infused with a large, burning fence post coated in creasote.

'Justice doth indeed existeth in thy world,' thus saith Google.

Justice only exists in the same way that beauty does. Justice isn't an objective thing that is out there; it doesn't exist at all until someone observes a situation and declares that it is 'just'. Without this observation, justice is nothing at all; no situation is intrinsically just or unjust.

Whether this means it actually exists or not is, I think, is something that could be the topic of further discussion. A lot of debatable, subjective things exist in this way (such as right and wrong, beauty, etiquette, and so on).

Personally, I would classify these as not 'existing', because they are constructs of understanding, not actual things. This doesn't make them any less important, necessarily, to various people, but I don't think that they're 'real' in a normal sense of the word. As loretian kindly pointed out in another thread, lots of people believing in something doesn't make it exist.

Justice stems from our sense of right and wrong.

As humans we tend to have a built in sense of right or wrong regardless of what culture we exist in. For instance: No culture around the world could honestly say that they believed the acts of hitler toward the Jews during world war II were right.

And, if right and wrong are subjective,(ie. 'What's right for you is not neccisarily right for me.') then what would happen if someone decided that it was right for them to murder you?

- creft

At least it's happy, right?

For me to poop on!

Where did you get that from?!